An Assessment of Qualitative Research on Corporate Governance Practices
Author(s):Dr. Mandeep Kaur1 ,Dr. Satish Kumar2
Affiliation: 1Assistant Professor, Department of Management I.K. Gujral Punjab Technical University Kapurthala (Punjab) , 2Assistant Professor, Govt. Arts, Science & Commerce College Dharamjaigarh Dist. Raigarh (Chhattisgarh)
Page No: 10-14-
Volume issue & Publishing Year: Volume 2 Issue 4,April-2025
Journal: International Journal of Modern Engineering and Management | IJMEM
ISSN NO: 3048-8230
DOI:
Abstract:
Most nations in the globe have seen arise in the importance of corporate governance in the last few decades, particularly in the wake of the early 2000s business crises. Due to these corporate failures, there is an increasing amount of scholarly and applied study being conducted in this field. While there is a large and varied body of quantitative literature on corporate governance, there is not as much qualitative study in this field. In order to inform future corporate governance research, this study reviews previous qualitative studies on the topic. Rich data in this field can be gathered by the researcher using the qualitative study
Keywords:
Standards, Qualitative, Corporate Governance, Committees, Directors, Literature, Ownership Structure.
Reference:
[1] Zain, M., Subramaniam, N., & Stewart, J. (2006). Internal auditors’ assessment of their contribution to financial statement audits: The relation with audit committee and internal audit function characteristics. International Journal of Auditing, 10(1), 1–18.
Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1983). Agency problems, auditing, and the theory of the firm: Some evidence. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 613–633.[2] Turley, S., & Zaman, M. (2007). Audit committee effectiveness: Informal processes and behavioural effects. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(5), 765–788.
[3] Suwaidan, S., & Qasim, A. (2010). External auditors’ reliance on internal auditors and its impact on audit fees: An empirical investigation. Managerial Auditing Journal, 25(6), 509–525.
[4] Soobaroyen, T., & Mahadeo, J. D. (2012). Do corporate governance codes improve board accountability? Evidence from an emerging economy. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 9(4), 337–362.
[5] Schneider, A., Gramling, A., Hermanson, D. R., & Ye, Z. (2009). A review of academic literature on internal control reporting under SOX. Journal of Accounting Literature, 28, 1–46.
[6] Sarens, G., De Beelde, I., & Everaert, P. (2009). Internal audit: A comfort provider to the audit committee. The British Accounting Review, 1–17.
[7] Rezaee, Z., Olibe, K. O., & Mimmier, G. (2003). Improving corporate governance: The role of audit committee disclosures. Managerial Auditing Journal, 18(6), 530–547.
[8] Parker, L. D. (2007). Internal governance in the nonprofit boardroom: A participant observer study. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(5), 923–934.
[9] OECD. (2004). OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
[10] Norwani, N. M., Mohamad, Z. Z., & Chek, I. T. (2011). Corporate governance failure and its impact on financial reporting within selected companies. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(21), 205–213.
[11] McNulty, T., Zattoni, A., & Douglas, T. (2013). Developing corporate governance research through qualitative methods: A review of previous studies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(2), 183–198.
[12] McCracken, S., Salterio, S. E., & Gibbins, M. (2008). Auditor–client management relationships and roles in negotiating financial reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4–5), 362–383.