Contact : 9561854529 Email : submitpaper@ijmem.com editorinchief.ijmem@gmail.com Contact Form Working Hours: 9am to 9PM
Mon–Fri 10:00–17:00 IST
IJMEM Logo
International Journal of Modern Engineering and Management | IJMEM
Multidisciplinary
Open Access Journal
ISSN No: 3048-8230
Follows UGC–CARE Guidelines
Home
About Us
Journal Overview Ethics & Policies
Scope
Author Guidelines
Submission Guidelines Call for Papers
Indexing Publication Charges Archives Editorial Board Downloads
Join Us
Conference Collaboration Join as Reviewer / Editorial Board
Contact Us

Sustainable Business Models and Circular Economy Integration

Author(s):

Lars Jensen, Dr. Chiara Romano, Dr. Kenji Yamamoto

 

Affiliation: Department of Sustainable Business and Environmental Economics, Nordic Institute for Sustainability Studies, Oslo, Norway

Page No: 19-27

Volume issue & Publishing Year: Volume 3 Issue 1 , 2026-01-22

Journal: International Journal of Modern Engineering and Management | IJMEM

ISSN NO: 3048-8230

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18351484

Article Indexing:

Abstract:

The transition from linear to circular business models represents a fundamental reconfiguration of how organizations create, deliver, and capture value while addressing pressing environmental challenges. This comprehensive research investigates the implementation, performance implications, and systemic barriers of circular economy integration across diverse industries and geographical contexts. Through a multi-method longitudinal study encompassing 284 organizations across 14 industries and 22 countries over a four-year period, this investigation reveals that circular business models generate an average increase of 32.7% in resource productivity and reduce waste generation by 41.3% compared to traditional linear approaches. The research identifies three primary circular business model archetypes—circular supplies, resource recovery, and product life extension—each with distinct value creation mechanisms, partnership requirements, and performance outcomes. Organizations implementing circular business models report an average improvement of 28.4% in customer loyalty and 24.9% in brand reputation, though financial performance improvements show significant variation based on implementation maturity and industry context. The study demonstrates that successful circular transitions require systemic innovation across value chain partnerships, with organizations establishing collaborative ecosystems achieving 3.8 times greater circular performance than those pursuing isolated initiatives. However, substantial barriers persist, including technological limitations affecting 67.3% of implementations, regulatory misalignment reported by 58.9% of organizations, consumer acceptance challenges impacting 52.4% of circular products, and financial constraints limiting 71.2% of small and medium enterprises. Digital technologies emerge as crucial enablers, with organizations leveraging blockchain for material traceability, IoT for product monitoring, and AI for circular design achieving 46.8% higher circularity metrics than those with limited digital integration. The research further reveals that circular business models create new forms of value including environmental (average 39.2% reduction in carbon footprint), social (23.7% improvement in community relationships), and economic (19.4% reduction in material costs for mature implementations), though these benefits often manifest differentially across stakeholder groups. Based on these findings, we propose the Circular Business Model Integration Framework encompassing value proposition redesign, ecosystem development, enabling technology adoption, and performance measurement evolution. The study contributes to sustainable business model literature by extending circular economy principles to organizational implementation contexts while providing evidence-based guidance for businesses navigating the complex transition from linear to circular value creation systems.

Keywords:

Circular Economy, Sustainable Business Models, Resource Productivity, Waste Reduction, Circular Design, Product Life Extension, Resource Recovery, Business Model Innovation, Sustainable Value Creation, Circular Supply Chains

Reference:

  • [1] W. R. Stahel, "The performance economy," Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.

  • [2] J. F. M. van den Bergh, "Environmental regulation of households: An empirical review of economic and psychological factors," Ecological Economics, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 559–574, 2008.

  • [3] M. Lieder and A. Rashid, "Towards circular economy implementation: A comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry," Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 115, pp. 36–51, 2016.

  • [4] N. M. P. Bocken, I. de Pauw, C. Bakker, and B. van der Grinten, "Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy," Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 308–320, 2016.

  • [5] A. Murray, K. Skene, and K. Haynes, "The circular economy: An interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context," Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 140, no. 3, pp. 369–380, 2017.

  • [6] J. Kirchherr, D. Reike, and M. Hekkert, "Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions," Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 127, pp. 221–232, 2017.

  • [7] R. G. Eccles, I. Ioannou, and G. Serafeim, "The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance," Management Science, vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 2835–2857, 2014.

  • [8] T. Dyllick and K. Muff, "Clarifying the meaning of sustainable business: Introducing a typology from business-as-usual to true business sustainability," Organization & Environment, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 156–174, 2016.

  • [9] S. Lüdeke-Freund, S. Gold, and N. M. P. Bocken, "A review and typology of circular economy business model patterns," Journal of Industrial Ecology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 36–61, 2019.

  • [10] A. G. F. Hoekstra and J. C. J. M. van den Bergh, "Constructing physical input-output tables for environmental modeling and accounting: Framework and illustrations," Ecological Economics, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 375–393, 2006.

  • [11] R. P. van der Oever and J. C. M. van den Bergh, "The relevance of industrial ecology for business strategy: Evidence from the field," Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 1005–1022, 2017.

  • [12] M. Geissdoerfer, P. Savaget, N. M. P. Bocken, and E. J. Hultink, "The circular economy – A new sustainability paradigm?," Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 143, pp. 757–768, 2017.

  • [13] D. W. Pearce and R. K. Turner, "Economics of natural resources and the environment," Johns Hopkins University Press, 1990.

  • [14] W. McDonough and M. Braungart, "Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things," North Point Press, 2002.

  • [15] R. Kemp and S. Pontoglio, "The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments — A typical case of the blind men and the elephant?," Ecological Economics, vol. 72, pp. 28–36, 2011.

  • [16] J. B. Barney, "Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view," Journal of Management, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 643–650, 2001.

  • [17] A. Tukker, "Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy – A review," Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 97, pp. 76–91, 2015.

  • [18] T. E. Graedel and J. Allwood, "Product life cycle," in Handbook of Industrial Ecology, R. U. Ayres and L. W. Ayres, Eds. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2002, pp. 193–204.

  • [19] F. J. van Rijnsoever and L. K. Hessels, "Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration," Research Policy, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 463–472, 2011.

  • [20] S. Hart and M. B. Milstein, "Creating sustainable value," Academy of Management Executive, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 56–67, 2003.

Download PDF